Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.302
Filtrar
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(44): e22847, 2020 Oct 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238619

RESUMEN

Numerous cases of pneumonia from a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China during December 2019.We determined the correlations of patient parameters with disease severity in patients with COVID-19.A total of 132 patients from Wuhan Fourth Hospital who had COVID-19 from February 1 to February 29 in 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Ninety patients had mild disease, 32 had severe disease, and 10 had critical disease. The severe/critical group was older (P < .05), had a higher proportion of males (P < .05), and had a greater mortality rate (0% vs 61.9%, P < .05). The main symptoms were fever (n = 112, 84.8%) and cough (n = 96, 72.7%). Patients were treated with antiviral agents (n = 94, 71.2%), antibiotics (n = 92, 69.7%), glucocorticoids (n = 46, 34.8%), intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 38, 27.3%), and/or traditional Chinese medicine (n = 40, 30.3%). Patients in the severe/critical group received mechanical ventilation (n = 22, 16.7%) or high-flow nasal can-nula oxygen therapy (n = 6, 4.5%). Chest computed tomography (CT) indicated bilateral pneumonia in all patients. Relative to the mild group, the severe/critical group had higher levels of leukocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), D-dimer, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), liver enzymes, and myocardial enzymes (P < .05), and decreased levels of lymphocytes and blood oxygen partial pressure (P < .05).The main clinical symptoms of patients from Wuhan who had COVID-19 were fever and cough. Patients with severe/critical disease were more likely to be male and elderly. Disease severity correlated with increased leukocytes, CRP, PCT, BNP, D-dimer, liver enzymes, and myocardial enzymes, and with decreased lymphocytes and blood oxygen partial pressure.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(41): e22697, 2020 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture therapy for asymptomatic infection of COVID-19. METHODS: The following electronic databases will be searched from December 2019 to December 2020: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan-fang database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Databases (CBM), and other databases. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about this topic will be included. Two independent researchers will operate article retrieval, duplication removing, screening, quality evaluation, and data analyses by Review Manager (V.5.3.5). Meta-analyses, subgroup analysis, and/or descriptive analysis will be performed based on the included data conditions. RESULTS: High-quality synthesis and/or descriptive analysis of current evidence will be provided from the time of negative nucleic acid detection for 2 consecutive times (not on the same day), cure rate, converting to clinical diagnosis rate, and side effects of acupuncture. CONCLUSION: This study will provide the evidence of whether acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for asymptomatic infection of COVID-19. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42020179729.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , COVID-19 , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Pandemias , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Infect ; 87(2): 120-127, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317569

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, influenza was the most frequent cause of viral respiratory pneumonia requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Few studies have compared the characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and influenza. METHODS: This was a French nationwide study comparing COVID-19 (March 1, 2020-June 30, 2021) and influenza patients (January 1, 2014-December 31, 2019) admitted to an ICU during pre-vaccination era. Primary outcome was in-hospital death. Secondary outcome was need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: 105,979 COVID-19 patients were compared to 18,763 influenza patients. Critically ill patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be men with more comorbidities. Patients with influenza required more invasive mechanical ventilation (47 vs. 34%, p < 0·001), vasopressors (40% vs. 27, p < 0·001) and renal-replacement therapy (22 vs. 7%, p < 0·001). Hospital mortality was 25% and 21% (p < 0·001) in patients with COVID-19 and influenza, respectively. In the subgroup of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay was significantly longer in patients with COVID-19 (18 [10-32] vs. 15 [8-26] days, p < 0·001). Adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and modified SAPS II score, in-hospital death was higher in COVID-19 patients (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [aSHR]=1.69; 95%CI=1.63-1.75) compared with influenza patients. COVID-19 was also associated with less invasive mechanical ventilation (aSHR=0.87; 95%CI=0.85-0.89) and a higher likelihood of death without invasive mechanical ventilation (aSHR=2.40; 95%CI=2.24-2.57). CONCLUSION: Despite younger age and lower SAPS II score, critically ill COVID-19 patients had a longer hospital stay and higher mortality than patients with influenza.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Neumonía Viral , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
N Engl J Med ; 383(19): 1813-1826, 2020 11 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), no antiviral agents have yet been shown to be efficacious. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. RESULTS: A total of 1062 patients underwent randomization (with 541 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo). Those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 10 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 11), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 18) among those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.49; P<0.001, by a log-rank test). In an analysis that used a proportional-odds model with an eight-category ordinal scale, the patients who received remdesivir were found to be more likely than those who received placebo to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9, after adjustment for actual disease severity). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were 6.7% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo by day 15 and 11.4% with remdesivir and 15.2% with placebo by day 29 (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.03). Serious adverse events were reported in 131 of the 532 patients who received remdesivir (24.6%) and in 163 of the 516 patients who received placebo (31.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.).


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenosina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina/administración & dosificación , Alanina/efectos adversos , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
13.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(5): 926-929, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280768

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel virus that causes COVID-19 infection, has recently emerged and caused a deadly pandemic. Studies have shown that this virus causes worse outcomes and a higher mortality rate in older adults and those with comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A significant percentage of older American adults have these diseases, putting them at a higher risk of infection. Additionally, many adults with hypertension, diabetes, and CKD are placed on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. Studies have shown that these medications upregulate the ACE-2 receptor, the very receptor that the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses to enter host cells. Although it has been hypothesized that this may cause a further increased risk of infection, more studies on the role of these medications in COVID-19 infections are necessary. In this review, we discuss the transmission, symptomatology, and mortality of COVID-19 as they relate to older adults, and possible treatments that are currently under investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:926-929, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados no Aleatorios como Asunto , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 70: 101560, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2278969

RESUMEN

In the course of a few short weeks, many of the established legal frameworks relating to decision-making in England & Wales in respect of those with impaired decision-making capacity have been ripped up, or apparently rendered all but unusable. Although the Mental Capacity Act 2005 itself has not been amended, the impact of other legislation (especially the Coronavirus Act 2020) means that duties towards those with impaired decision-making capacity have been radically changed. This article reflects the experience of a practising barrister in England & Wales grappling with the impact of COVID-19 upon the Mental Capacity Act 2005 across a range of fields in the weeks after the world appeared to change in mid-March 2020.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Competencia Mental/psicología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Inglaterra , Derechos Humanos/psicología , Humanos , Competencia Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal , Gales
15.
Orv Hetil ; 161(45): 1899-1907, 2020 11 08.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276277

RESUMEN

Összefoglaló. A 2020. év elején kirobbant COVID-19-világjárvány többek között ráirányította a figyelmet az életmento-életfenntartó kezelések igazságos elosztásának érzékeny kérdésére is. Európán belül elsoként Olaszországot sújtotta a katasztrófa, a válsághelyzetben pedig az érzéstelenítés, fájdalomcsillapítás, újraélesztés és intenzív ellátás területén tevékenykedo szakemberek olasz társasága, a SIAARTI 2020. március 6-án közzétett egy 15 pontos ajánlást. E szerint utilitarista megközelítéssel a rendelkezésre álló szukös eroforrásokat azon betegek kezelésére kellene fordítani, akik túlélési esélye nagyobb, valamint több életévre számíthatnak a jövoben, mert ez biztosíthatja a leheto legtöbb ember számára a leheto legnagyobb hasznot. A javaslat komoly szakmai vitát robbantott ki, amely egyértelmuvé tette, hogy az orvosi eszközök igazságos elosztására vonatkozó diskurzust feltétlenül folytatni kell, nemcsak Olaszországon belül, hanem a pandémiától sújtott többi államban is. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(45): 1899-1907. Summary. Among other queries, the explosion of the COVID-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 has firmly put in focus the sensitive issue of how to allocate scarcely available life-saving treatments in a fair and just manner. The first European country to face an emergency caused by the pandemic was Italy. In a rapidly escalating crisis, on 6th March 2020, the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) issued a series of 15 recommendations, suggesting that a utilitarian approach should be adopted in Italian health care and the extremely scarce resources should be reserved for patients with a greater probability of survival and life expectancy, in order to maximize the benefits for the largest possible number of people. The recommendations generated a heated debate among health care professionals, thereby evidencing that similar discussions must be initiated and pursued in all countries affected by the pandemic. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(45): 1899-1907.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/ética , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Justicia Social , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Italia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Am J Transplant ; 20(7): 1849-1858, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270901

RESUMEN

The clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after solid organ transplant (SOT) remain unknown. We report our preliminary experience with 18 SOT (kidney [44.4%], liver [33.3%], and heart [22.2%]) recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 by March 23, 2020 at a tertiary-care center at Madrid. Median age at diagnosis was 71.0 ± 12.8 years, and the median interval since transplantation was 9.3 years. Fever (83.3%) and radiographic abnormalities in form of unilateral or bilateral/multifocal consolidations (72.2%) were the most common presentations. Lopinavir/ritonavir (usually associated with hydroxychloroquine) was used in 50.0% of patients and had to be prematurely discontinued in 2 of them. Other antiviral regimens included hydroxychloroquine monotherapy (27.8%) and interferon-ß (16.7%). As of April 4, the case-fatality rate was 27.8% (5/18). After a median follow-up of 18 days from symptom onset, 30.8% (4/13) of survivors developed progressive respiratory failure, 7.7% (1/13) showed stable clinical condition or improvement, and 61.5% (8/13) had been discharged home. C-reactive protein levels at various points were significantly higher among recipients who experienced unfavorable outcome. In conclusion, this frontline report suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection has a severe course in SOT recipients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Trasplante de Órganos , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fiebre , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Interferón beta/administración & dosificación , Lopinavir/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Radiografía Torácica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ritonavir/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología
19.
Hosp Pediatr ; 10(9): 802-805, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Reports from China relating to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in children indicate a milder disease course compared with adults. Although a few pediatric COVID-19 reports from other parts of the world exist, there are none from the United Kingdom. We describe the clinical characteristics of children with COVID-19 admitted to a specialist children's hospital in United Kingdom. METHODS: Retrospective case-series of inpatients with a positive polymerase chain reaction test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, during a 6-week period from March 14 to April 24, 2020. RESULTS: Forty-five children tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 during the study period. Median (interquartile range) age was 3.5 (0.7-12) years, and 31 (69%) were male. Children with comorbidities constituted 64% (29 of 45) of the study population, including 44% (20 of 45) who were considered "extremely vulnerable." Fever (67%) and cough (55%) were the most common symptoms. High C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) was observed in 68% (19 of 28). Lymphopenia (<1.2 × 109/L) was observed in 23% (9 of 40) of children, but it was related to coexisting medical conditions in 6 children. Nine children required supplemental oxygen, two of whom received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen; one needed noninvasive ventilation and one child required invasive mechanical ventilation. Median length of stay of children with an admission outcome (n = 42, 93%) was 3 (2-7) days. There were no COVID-19-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had a relatively mild course of illness in majority of the hospitalized children that included a subgroup of vulnerable children with significant comorbidities. Confirmation of this in larger nationwide studies of children is required.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Estado de Salud , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido
20.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20233, 2020 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257418

RESUMEN

Due to the current development around the COVID-19 pandemic, palliative ch has created a Task Force to provide recommendations for health professionals on the treatment of palliative care patients in the various settings ‒ inpatient and outpatient.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Personal de Salud/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Suiza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA